The downturn in centralized crypto exchanges continues. With spot trading volumes falling to a more than two-year low, BitMEX announced its permanent closure in September, and other platforms such as BitMart have also recently announced shutdowns or bankruptcies, further intensifying signs of industry consolidation.
Exchanges exit one after another
BitMEX, which launched perpetual contracts in 2016, was one of the early platforms representing the crypto derivatives market. Now, after years of regulatory and legal disputes, the platform has decided to cease operations. The report mentions that in the past week, in addition to BitMEX, BitMart, Movement Labs, and Storj Labs have also announced closures or entered bankruptcy proceedings.
BitMart has notified users to close their positions within 30 days and withdraw their assets within 6 months. Some users expressed concern about the withdrawal delays after the announcement. BitMart has not explained the reason for the shutdown.
Retail transactions have cooled significantly.
CoinDesk data shows that by April 2026, monthly spot trading volume on major centralized platforms will have fallen to $1.05 trillion, the lowest level in 25 months. The South Korean market has also seen a significant decline. Wu Blockchain, citing data, reports that trading volume on South Korea's top five cryptocurrency exchanges has fallen by 88% from its peak.
Analysts believe that platforms that previously relied on high leverage and retail investor activity are facing a more challenging operating environment. Jason Fernandes, co-founder of AdLunam, stated that the current market lacks sufficient trading volume, retail investor interest has significantly weakened, and even Telegram community activity is declining.
Compliance costs raise the entry barrier for small and medium-sized platforms
Many industry insiders believe that exchanges can no longer sustain operations by relying solely on retail investor speculation. For platforms to continue operating, they need stronger capital, a more complete compliance system, more transparent reserve documentation, and a wider range of cross-asset trading services.
Dutch analyst Michael Van De Poppe stated that with the regulatory framework continuously improving, only large exchanges are better able to bear the compliance costs, leaving smaller platforms with only two options: exit or be acquired. OKX Europe CEO Erald Ghoos also stated that after the EU's Crypto Asset Market Regulation Act (MiCA) came into effect, many virtual asset service providers in Europe will face a heavier regulatory burden.
The impact of the BitMEX case has not yet subsided.
BitMEX had previously lost a significant number of traders due to enforcement actions by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice. The report mentioned that the platform was fined $100 million for violating bank secrecy regulations. Although U.S. President Trump later pardoned BitMEX, the operational pressure from years of litigation has not completely disappeared.
BitMEX is currently facing a new civil lawsuit. The plaintiffs accuse it of withholding traders' collateral and of insider trading arrangements. The lawsuit claims that these arrangements resulted in some clients' collateral being retained, while the remaining Bitcoin was transferred to the platform's insurance fund, involving 622 BTC, valued at over $40.5 million according to the lawsuit.
Derivatives trading has not shrunk in tandem.
Despite the exit of individual platforms, the overall crypto derivatives market has not contracted to the same extent. BitMEX's perpetual contracts, launched years ago, have now become important trading products on major platforms such as Binance, OKX, and CME Group.

Gate executive Edwin Cheung stated that the trading volume lost by BitMEX will most likely be absorbed by other established platforms. This also means that competition among exchanges is shifting from early high leverage and retail investor-driven growth to a competition based on scale, compliance capabilities, and comprehensive service capabilities.











