Samson Mow: There are significant differences between BIP-110 and BIP-148; Michael Saylor reprises this view.
2026-08-11 20:58:45
According to CoinMeta, based on early monitoring of in, Samson Mow indicates that BIP-110 and BIP-148 cannot be compared on an equal footing. BIP-148 has gained support from developers, exchanges, wallets, miners, and large coin holders, possessing support in terms of economic weight, computing power, and nodes, while BIP-110 currently mainly has the support of some nodes. SegWit is promoted by BIP-91 for miners to adopt BIP-141. BIP-148 poses a credible threat but has not undergone chain split testing. Michael Saylor reposted this article.
Source:Internet
This content is for market information only and does not constitute investment advice.
Follow HQYC official accounts to stay updated

Hot Articles
Refresh

'No longer a distant place': F2Pool Co-founder Chun Wang joins SpaceX's 2-year mission to Mars
05-22 18:25

Polymarket Targets Japan Approval Despite Gambling Laws
05-22 18:00

ZachXBT flags suspected exploit involving Polymarket's UMA adapter contract on Polygon
05-22 17:57

ZachXBT flags $520K Polymarket exploit on Polygon, team says funds are safe
05-22 17:24

Verus bridge exploiter returns 4,052 ETH, retains $2.8 million bounty: onchain analyst
05-22 17:24



