Avalanche (AVAX)価格リアルタイムチャート、予測、時価総額、トークンアンロック、AVAXコンセプト株 HQYC

BTC

$64,760.00

+0.40%

/AVAX価格

Avalanche

AVAX

No.41

$6.46

+0.94%

≈$6.46

時価総額

$2993139878.430754

流通時価

$2788589161.530754

流通量

431.74M

流通率

93.166%

総供給量

463.41M

最大供給量

715.75M

24h取引額

$34709779.86455549

24h取引量(BTC)

224.43M

24h換手率

8.048287%

市場シェア

0.17%

価格パフォーマンス

安

6.31

振幅

+0.03%

高

6.53

上場価格

$0.50

史上最高(2020-12-31)

$146.22

-95.58%

史上最低(2021-11-21)

$2.79

+131.6%

公式情報

契約

Moonbeam: 0x4792...13d84e

公式リンク

ホワイトペーパー

github

SNS

ネット情報

価格換算

チャート

市場

について

価格

時価総額

biểu đồ k-line

深度

1分

5分

15分

1時間

4時間

1日

TradingView

1時間

+0.09%

24時間

+0.94%

7日

+0.14%

30日

-0.25%

1年

-73.51%

すべて

+1.19K%

HQYC AI投資アシスタント

AVAX下跌原因

AVAX资金流向

AVAX买卖支撑位

AVAX多空比分析

AVAX趋势分析

AI質問

AVAX市場

CEX現物

CEXデリバティブ

ペア

#	解除日	解除数量	解除価値	解除詳細
1	2026/08/10	1.67M	$10765538.25	1
2	2026/11/08	1.67M	$10765538.25	1
3	2027/02/06	1.67M	$10765538.25	1
4	2027/05/07	1.67M	$10765538.25	1
5	2027/08/05	1.67M	$10765538.25	1

AVAXについて

雪崩协议是一种 layer-1 区块链平台，用于去中心化应用和自定义区块链网络，作为以太坊的竞争对手，每秒可处理多达6,500笔交易而不牺牲可扩展性。其核心功能是通过独特的多元链架构提供高性能、低延迟的智能合约和去中心化金融应用基础设施，将共识、执行和协调分离到不同的子系统中。

66%

33%

強気

弱気

コミュニティ見解

Stani

フォロー

The recent phasing out of low-adoption assets and networks on the Aave platform should not be interpreted as a sign of a shift in attitude towards any L1 or L2 layer. The goal is simply to reduce Aave's operational, technical, and economic risks so that we can focus on more impactful priorities, such as developing existing high-value markets and expanding securities financing. L2 layers remain crucial for the Ethereum user experience. For example, the Aave App's stablecoin uses an L2 layer as its ledger layer, which will facilitate integration with the mainstream DeFi user base. Similarly, networks like Avalanche play a vital role in bringing RWA (Risk-Weighted Assets) onto the blockchain for institutional business expansion, a historically weak area for Ethereum.

331

币安Binance华语

フォロー

🚀 Binance Web3 API now supports more public blockchain networks. You can now develop on the following public chains: ✅ TRON ✅ Robinhood Chain ✅ Avalanche C-Chain ✅ Scroll ✅ Mode ✅ Sonic ✅ Katana ✅ Metis Binance Web3 API now supports 18 chains (including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, etc.), allowing you to easily integrate with more ecosystems with a single API. 👉 Learn more:

361

Token Terminal 📊

07-29 00:23

フォロー

Aave v4 has reached $4 million in deposits on the @avax platform, with $1.1 million in active loans. In the past two weeks, v4's deposits have grown approximately tenfold. Products and networks to watch 👇

306

CoinMarketCap

07-28 16:27

フォロー

Breaking news: 📊 Data from Bitwise shows that despite the prices of Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and Avalanche (AVAX) all falling by about 50% or more over the past year, trading activity for Ethereum, Solana, and Avalanche has increased, and transaction costs have decreased.

349

Crypto Tony

07-28 05:02

フォロー

$AVAX / $USD - Latest Updates Keep a close eye on this; if Bitcoin can remain stable, AVAX/$USD could see another surge.

380

Stani

07-26 21:06

フォロー

Incentives are still available for USDC and USDT vendors who deploy the V4 version of @aave on @avax.

364

PlanB

07-26 01:02

フォロー

The topic of fork filters. I usually don't have time, but this morning I listened to a discussion on Twitter earlier this week featuring some well-meaning Bitcoin newbies sharing their thoughts and concerns, and why they thought supporting #110 was reasonable. After listening, my feeling was that if these were the people with #110 in their usernames, I regret to see them fork and ultimately be disappointed because they don't understand why Bitcoin strongly rejects #110. So, I'm offering a more empathetic, constructive, and higher-level explanation of why #110 shouldn't be supported. I hope this explanation is simple enough to understand, starting from basic principles. They seem to want to understand people's thoughts and are skeptical of people's intentions. So, if someone asks me why Bitcoin is important, what it is, I would say that my personal mission and expectation for Bitcoin is to build a cypherpunk future, and the "avalanche" event is just a blueprint, from which to work backward. I hope that Bitcoin can ultimately achieve a completely free market through non-seizure, mathematically sound hard currency. Not everyone can accept this level of freedom, but that's just my opinion. And surprisingly, I think it's a positive development that even today, many governments are beginning to understand and value Bitcoin's gold-like mathematical reliability. Others may hold more moderate views than I do, but still appreciate this currency's ability to effectively resist censorship. For the sake of motives (if that's not obvious enough): I utterly despise spam, which is why I designed HashCash nearly thirty years ago when I was researching decentralized bearer currencies with others and running nodes in privacy-focused cypherpunk P2P networks. People seem unhappy about the change in Bitcoin's default refund policy. I just want to assert that the reasons for Bitcoin changing its default relay strategy are perfectly valid and simple, but most people haven't done their homework and don't know what those reasons are. Perhaps it's due to a lack of technical understanding, despite thousands of posts attempting to explain it in various simplified ways. This lack of understanding leads to the spread of misinformation. So, here's a higher-level explanation from a fundamental perspective. The decentralization required to create cypherpunk currencies has several implications: a side effect is that you can't impose your views on others. This very mechanism that facilitates decentralization runs counter to the goal of BIP 110, whose fundamental purpose is to regulate others. I understand supporters disagree, but please consider this carefully. You can modify your own software, but you can't modify other people's. Another crucial and extremely powerful technological immune system of Bitcoin is that it cannot allow those who lack technical understanding to deliberately compromise its security, decentralized robustness, and core properties. Doing so would quickly lead to disastrous consequences, and people would fight back. Therefore, Bitcoin's message is: it politely says "no" to what you want. I'm sorry, Bitcoin users do understand and sympathize with your good intentions, your lofty ideas are reasonable, and your proposed defense of Bitcoin is reasonable, but these ideas lack a practical basis. Moreover, without realizing this, your approach to realizing these ideas fundamentally conflicts with the free, permissionless nature of cypherpunk currencies. My advice is to listen to those with more experience who understand the system and how it works. No matter how many details you want to know, delve into the fundamental reasons why decentralization and cypherpunk currencies inevitably lead to these consequences. I can assure you that the developers and the protocol ecosystem value and prioritize bearer hard currency (and their aversion to spam) as much as, or even more than, you. You may disagree with individual developers' choices, opinions, or ways of expression. However, you also need to understand that decentralized technical consensus mechanisms like the IETF build a protective anti-change mechanism that effectively protects Bitcoin's mission. This means that no developer can change anything without the technical consensus of hundreds of other developers and protocol observers. These observers are meticulous, knowledgeable, and intelligent individuals who won't overlook any unresolved technical issues. It is precisely because of this technical consensus that this protective anti-change mechanism is so powerful, decentralized, and has a multiplier effect. Many technically skilled mainstream developers, with their cypherpunk-esque mission-driven mindset, are likely more committed than you to understanding and appreciating freedom on permissionless networks. This is because many of you may still be subconsciously influenced by the "Matrix," which they have long since transcended and immersed themselves in decades ago. They think naturally in this field, while you are still only scratching the surface. Many haven't truly understood or experienced how the internet works—a field without police, without policy authority, only mathematics, free markets, and hard currency. Unfortunately, this will also influence your perspective. Now, face a harsh reality: if you are unwilling to listen to rational opinions, unwilling to educate yourself, unwilling to learn, then the same freedom applies to you: your permissionless action is to unite and create a fork. But Bitcoin will not join in. (No offense intended.) Rejoin Bitcoin now, or if you still have doubts and need to experience the failure of the 110 fork firsthand to begin your reflection and learning journey, you can join later. It would be a regrettable thing if Bitcoin lost confidence due to a lack of understanding of how it works. We are all working hard to defend Bitcoin and keep it moving towards its intended goals. Incidentally, this includes the technical advocates of 110.

487

Crypto Tony

07-25 22:52

フォロー

Looking back at 2021-2023, we witnessed: AVAX rose from $9 to $50 SOL rose from $8 to $120 INJ rose from $1.10 to $45 FET rose from $0.05 to $0.75 LINK rose from $4.90 to $17.00 What's next, you legendary figures?

306

吴说区块链

07-24 07:34

フォロー

Wu learned that Bitwise released its "Q3 2026 Staking Report," analyzing staking, on-chain activity, and network revenue for Ethereum, Solana, Hyperliquid, Avalanche, NEAR, and Tempo based on data from Q2 2026. The report indicates that most public chains experienced a phenomenon of "increased on-chain activity and decreased protocol revenue," primarily due to increased block space supply from scaling and fee reductions, rather than a general decrease in demand. Ethereum's active staking rose to 40.2 million ETH, representing approximately 33% of the supply, but network revenue fell to $64 million; Solana's staking rate was approximately 68%, with 9.8 billion non-voting transactions, and network revenue decreased to $51 million. The report also shows that Hyperliquid's perpetual contract trading volume reached $652 billion in the second quarter, with non-crypto asset trading accounting for 32%; NEAR base chain revenue declined, but Intents-related fees increased; Tempo processed approximately $386 million in stablecoin transfers in its first full quarter after launch. Bitwise stated that institutional participation is entering the public chain ecosystem through staking funds, tokenized assets, and on-chain payments, and various networks are also upgrading to improve scalability and transaction performance.

376

Grayscale

07-23 22:43

フォロー

Multiple blockchains are driving tokenization in different ways. Ethereum (ETH) → Home to the largest RWA market Sol (SOL) → Home to xStocksFi Link (LINK) → Home to DTCC AVAX → Home to Apollo's tokenized credit platform

351